How Do You Spell PATHETIC FALLACY?

1. Pathetic fallacy refers to a literary device in which human emotions, characteristics, or intentions are ascribed to inanimate objects, nature, or animals. It entails attributing human qualities or feelings to non-human entities, often in order to emphasize or heighten the emotional impact of a scene or a particular character's state of mind.

   Derived from the word "pathos," which connotes emotions, and "fallacy," indicating a flawed or deceptive mode of reasoning, pathetic fallacy often entails an exaggerated portrayal of nature or objects mirroring human emotions or actions. By personifying nature or objects this way, authors aim to evoke a certain mood, evoke sympathy or establish a deeper connection between readers and the subject matter.

   For instance, a common use of the pathetic fallacy would be describing a menacing storm as though it were filled with rage and fury, reflecting the inner turmoil of a character. Similarly, an author might describe a serene, beautiful landscape to compliment the mood of a calm and contented protagonist. By employing this device, authors are able to bring life to their settings and create a more immersive experience for readers, encouraging them to emotionally invest in the narrative.

   Although the pathetic fallacy is a powerful tool for evoking emotions, it is important to recognize that it is fundamentally an anthropomorphic projection and not a literal reality. Its purpose rests in its ability to create a more vivid and resonant experience for readers, ultimately enriching their engagement with the text.

Common Misspellings for PATHETIC FALLACY

The etymology of the term "pathetic fallacy" dates back to the 19th century. It was coined by the English art critic John Ruskin in his book "Modern Painters" published in 1856.

The term combines two elements: "pathetic", meaning emotionally affecting or evoking sympathy, and "fallacy", meaning a mistaken belief or misconception. The "pathetic fallacy" refers to the attribution of human emotions or characteristics to inanimate objects or natural phenomena.

Ruskin used this term to criticize the tendency of artists and writers to ascribe human emotions or feelings to nature or non-human entities. He saw it as an error, arguing that it distorted the truth and undermined accurate representation and perception.

The term gained popularity and acceptance as a literary and artistic criticism, referring to a flaw in reasoning or expression when authors or artists attribute human emotions to nature or objects.